DIP56 - inlining

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 3 February 2015 at 23:25:26 UTC, Peter Alexander 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 February 2015 at 23:23:35 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> We have an attribute system, why make this a pragma ?
>
> Rationale is in the DIP: "These are not attributes because they 
> should not affect the semantics of the function. In particular, 
> the function signature must not be affected."

That's bullshit. UDA do not change the semantic of a function. By 
the same reasoning they should be user defined pragma ?!??