New DIP73: D Drafting Library

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 18:23:19 UTC, Zach the Mystic 
wrote:
>> 1) All Phobos proposals must go through std.experimental.logger
>> 2) It must implement something generally desired in Phobos
>> 3) Implementation is supposed to be at least stable enough to 
>> not undergo a full rewrite after inclusion. Major API changes 
>> are acceptable.
>> 4) Before DMD/Phobos release is made existing packages that 
>> feel stable can undergo a formal review for inclusion in 
>> Phobos main package
>
> It seems to me that number 2 is wrong. It doesn't matter what 
> is generally desired. The final say depends completely on the 
> leadership. Yes or No has to come from above. Or am I wrong 
> about this?

No, you get it wrong. This is decided exclusively community 
voting. Andrei or Walter can veto something that they don't want 
but their explicit approval is not required.