Unreachable statement, do or do not, there is no try

Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Feb 10 21:00:33 PST 2015


On 2/10/2015 7:49 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Wait, what? I thought that something had to be a Throwable to be throwable
> or catchable.

Checking the code, I see it now requires Throwable. (D1 required only Object.)


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list