C++ function signature template parameter mangling issue
Benjamin Thaut via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Feb 17 04:07:02 PST 2015
On Tuesday, 17 February 2015 at 08:16:37 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> True, it might be easier to adjust the C++ side so it takes a
> pointer to a function type.
In this case it would be really ugly
ezDelegate<void()> vs ezDelegate<void(*)()>
I will do a pull request later today fixing this mangling issue.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list