Memory safety depends entirely on GC ?

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 16:22:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> Just replied to Marc about this. I should have phrased my 
> response as "I don't know of a _reasonable_ solution". BTW 
> please don't call me dishonest anymore, it's doubly 
> inappropriate seeing as we also work together. You wouldn't 
> think there's an actual possibility I go around lying to people 
> about such stuff. Thanks.
>
> Andrei

You have my apologies.

Still, qualifying something of _reasonable_ or not do not 
constitute a solid argument IMO. That is where my frustration 
come from here. You are arguing as if nothing was proposed when 
various persons made proposals. That do not foster progress. If 
actual criticism of the proposals were made, then we could argue 
about these criticisms, or come up with improvement of the 
proposals, but if you argue as if these proposal do not exists, 
we are condemned to talk past each other and no progress can be 
made.