Memory safety depends entirely on GC ?

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 2/24/15 11:14 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 18:01:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 2/24/15 9:47 AM, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= <schuetzm at gmx.net>"
>> wrote:
>>> Out of interest, because that will be crucial for the further
>>> development: are you completely opposed to any kind of ownership system,
>>> or is it something specific about this particular proposal that you
>>> don't like?
>>
>> There's no opposition on matters of principle/dogma. It's just too
>> complicated for what it provides.
>>
>> Andrei
>
> Compared to what ?

There is no comparison involved. The proposal is too complicated for 
what it does. -- Andrei