== operator
Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Jan 3 17:30:10 PST 2015
I've recently looked at how the '==' operator works with classes.
I was disappointed to find that 'a == b' always gets rewritten
to:
.object.opEquals(a, b);
The reason for my disappointment is that this results in
unnecessary overhead. I would think that the compiler would first
try to rewrite the '==' operator using a type-specific opEquals
method, then fall back on the generic version if one did not
exist. Is there a reason for this?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list