http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP25

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 31 December 2014 at 21:08:29 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> This mostly matches my current opinion of DIP25 + DIP69 as 
> well. It is not as much problem of lacking power but utterly 
> breaking KISS principle - too many special cases to remember, 
> too many concepts to learn. Path of minimal necessary change is 
> tempting but it is path to C++.

Yes especially when this path create non orthogonal features, 
which inevitably create a complexity explosion down the road.

This is the very old simple vs easy problem. Easy is tempting, 
but simple is what we want and they sometime are very different 
things.