http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP25 has been preliminarily approved for 2.067

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 1/16/15 4:41 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Please help us work the kinks out! Walter will be proceeding with the
> opt-in implementation for quicker pipelining.
>
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP25

I was about to complain because I remember not liking that DIP, but I 
see you removed inout as the notation, opting for return instead. Looks 
good now!

One thing I would note: in "Types of Result vs. Parameters", I think it 
should stay this way. Simple explanation is: IFTI/auto returns.

We have a very similar situation with inout. Originally, I insisted that 
inout only was valid on a parameter if it was also designated on the 
return. This kind of makes sense. But it caused issues with templates, 
because inout could be deduced by IFTI, and then it wasn't on the 
return. We have now fixed the compiler so inout reduces to const if not 
specified on the return.

I can potentially see a situation like this:

auto fun(T)(return ref T x)

Where the auto deduces to something that couldn't possibly match T or 
any piece of it. Causing this function to error just because of a type 
mismatch is the wrong move.

-Steve