forcing "@nogc" on class destructors

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 23:47:44 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 23:17:28 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>> Concurrent GC is too expensive for a proper system level 
>>> language.
>>>
>>
>> That is an unsubstanciated claim.
>
> And so is «pigs can't fly».
>

That is the old prove a negative bullshit.

You assert that something is too expensive for system language, 
which is not a negative, so the burden of proof is on you, 
substantiate your claim or you are just generating noise. Relying 
on cheap rhetorical trick is not going to fly (and you could add, 
no more than a pig).