forcing "@nogc" on class destructors
via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Jan 21 14:42:15 PST 2015
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 20:15:53 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> Ok listen, I'm gonna put a full stop to this conversation :
> - You provide no evidence of your claims.
HAHAHA…
> - You discard any evidence that contradict your claims without
> solid argument.
What evidence?
> - You are constantly shitfting the goalspot using more and
> more ridiculous claims (like malloc should not be used).
You can batch-allocate, but you need to use an O(1) allocator if
you want fast memory handling.
> There no point in continuing this discussion.
That's right...
> - A concurrent GC is not suitable for system languages.
And there is nothing that suggests that it is. Go is not a system
programming language.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list