accept @pure @nothrow @return attributes

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 2015-01-27 04:54, Zach the Mystic wrote:

> It's only creepy if it doesn't work. And the compiler doesn't need to
> change the code itself - it merely needs to tell you exactly what to do
> to fix it.
>
> I've thought about this some more. The way I would do it is have the
> compiler store all files which need to be fixed. Output the list in
> another file of a different type. Have dfix be able to read that file
> and automatically fix all files listed. Or just generate a D script to
> do just that (no need for a whole different file format. Literally just
> output "dfix.d", which has all the filenames built right into the
> script, and tell the user to 'dmd -run dfix.d'. Now you have a very
> clear intermediate step between compilation and user-activated step.

Seems overly complicated. How about the compiler just outputs new files 
instead.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg