accept @pure @nothrow @return attributes

[Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 28 January 2015 at 20:12:03 UTC, Zach the Mystic 
wrote:
> It's utterly confusing is the problem. I would consider it a 
> great disservice to all D programmers to allow this. Just 
> because you can doesn't mean you should. Walter has emphasize 
> there is absolutely no shortage of valid words. There is 
> however, a shortage of what a programmer can keep organized in 
> his head. That's the shortage you should prioritize, sir. I'm 
> not sure how to emphasize this anymore. We may just have to 
> agree to disagree.

I don't think this is confusing:

void foo() safe {
     bool safe = false;
}

Using "safe" as both a function attribute and an identifier 
doesn't seem confusing to me, however, it appears the leadership 
agrees with you so I submit.  Let's consider this resolved and 
move on to better more interesting things:)  I appreciate you 
taking the time to voice your opinion and helping me understand 
the arguments against this idea.