Mitigating the attribute proliferation - attribute inference for functions
via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Jul 18 03:46:51 PDT 2015
On Friday, 17 July 2015 at 18:23:58 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
> On Friday, 17 July 2015 at 16:40:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>
>> However, it has way too many holes in it still, because we've
>> blacklisted rather than whitelisted
>
> Not being a fan of constantly writing these attributes, I had
> been thinking a month or so ago that it would be cool if you
> could just specify defaults for the function attributes on a
> module-by-module basis. However, it's pretty easy to just set
> something similar up using the existing language features.
>
Yes, and in case you don't know yet, you don't even need braces:
module test;
@safe:
// everything from here on is @safe
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list