dmd 2.068, 2.069, 2.0xx Evil Plan going forward

[Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 20 July 2015 at 09:10:13 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> I just have one request.  We need to designate a supported 
> version of the compiler (2.069?) as the base to which we 
> convert and maintain compatibility for, and do not introduce 
> any new features after that point.

I don't fully understand what you're asking for.
Can you tell us what problem you're trying to address instead of 
which solution to apply.