Initial feedback for std.experimental.image

[ponce via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 21 July 2015 at 16:27:33 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> So in your view, I should ask the compiler devs of e.g. ldc/gdc 
> of what would be the better way to go for production code in 
> this instance?

Why not, this wasn't about std.experimental.image specifically. I 
just wanted to point out something that is counter-intuitive (of 
course this need to be cross-checked).

We discussed signed vs unsigned and I think Vladimir made 
compelling arguments about signed integers. 32-bit vs 64-bit vs 
machine-size words is another to choose and I'd better complain 
now than at vote time :).