Named parameters

[tcak via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 24 July 2015 at 14:34:12 UTC, Chris wrote:
> On Friday, 24 July 2015 at 14:15:11 UTC, Shammah Chancellor 
> wrote:
>> Since D has optional arguments -- why don't we support named 
>> parameters?  There are extremely handy and work beautifully in 
>> languages like C#.
>
> Here's a thread that dealt with this question:
>
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/m1g3kb$njo$1@digitalmars.com


Okay, understood that wrong ordered named parameters might create 
overloading problem, but why skipping parameters is not allowed, 
I don't get that one though.

[code]
void test(int a=5, int b){
}

test( , 7 );
[/code]

Programmer should still be forced to provide all parameters in 
correct order. How would this create a problem I can't see.