Inout unclearness

Kagamin via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Jul 26 06:06:48 PDT 2015


On Saturday, 25 July 2015 at 02:19:40 UTC, Max Klimov wrote:
> Where is unsafety? Code is the same for 3 versions

You only hope it's the same.

> Sorry, I didn't quite get it. What is this example for?

The example works like inout without inout, so you can use types 
with templates and virtual functions.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list