with(auto x = ...)

Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Jul 26 10:52:48 PDT 2015


On 07/24/2015 05:01 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> 
> .....ironically, given the other thread about statements as expressions
> where i said 'meh', this is actually a decent case for them too, to get
> the return value of foo out of that scope while still allowing auto.

It would make sense to extend the if statement rule [¹] to with [²] and
switch [³].

[¹]: http://dlang.org/grammar.html#IfStatement
[²]: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13526
[³]: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11070



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list