Last call for AliasSeq

[Daniel N via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 at 08:11:20 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Template constraints? Why on earth would TypeTuple need 
> template constraints? Because it was badly named and has Type 
> in its name? It holds more than types and that's a _good_ thing.

Yes, following the original intention, plain Tuple was the 
unconstrained version.

It has a perfectly find name given this definition from 
tuple.html:
"Type Tuples

If a tuple's elements are solely types, it is called a TypeTuple"