rvalue references

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 16:02:56 UTC, Namespace wrote:
> Thanks to DIP 25 I think it's time to review this again. I 
> would implement it (if no one else wants to do it), but there 
> are still some unanswered questions:
>
> 1. Is 'auto ref' still the chosen syntax (I guess so)?

Why not `scope ref` (or `in ref` == `const scope ref`)?

> 2. Should auto ref for templates act like auto ref for 
> non-templates (creates a temporary and pass it by ref) or 
> should the current behaviour stay (duplicate the function 2^N 
> times)?

With `scope ref`, obviously it should stay as-is.

> 3. What's with return ref, should auto ref for non-templates 
> include return ref (like auto ref for templates)?

Like above, no.

> 4. What's with this constellation:
>
> struct S { }
>
> void ene(S) { }
> void mene(ref S) { }
> void muh(auto ref S) { }
>
> should 'mene' (ref) interfere with 'muh' (auto ref)?

If overloading on `scope` is allowed, then yes, else no.