Daily downloads in decline

[Bruno Medeiros via Digitalmars-d]

On 01/06/2015 20:47, weaselcat wrote:
> at the risk of sounding like a broken record, if ldc/gdc not being 2.067
> stops a DDMD release due to dmd's generated code being too slow, maybe
> it's time to phase dmd out ;)

It's past the time.

The traction and support that Rust gained, even before 1.0, showed that 
having your primary toolchain based on GCC or LLVM is the only 
sustainable way forward (and even of those two, GCC might not be able to 
keep with LLVM).

-- 
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros