Daily downloads in decline
weaselcat via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jun 9 21:57:17 PDT 2015
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 02:56:26 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 02:25:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 6/9/2015 6:25 PM, weaselcat wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 01:21:43 UTC, Walter Bright
>>> wrote:
>>>> We wouldn't have had a Win64 version of D without DMD.
>>>
>>> There's a 64 bit version of LDC-MSVC right on LDC's github
>>> page, does it not work?
>>
>> Recently it did not exist, but Win64 had become critical to
>> D's future.
>
> Just out of curiosity, if ldc or gdc was able to bring their
> compile times down, would you ever consider dropping support
> for dmd?
ldc already compiles release builds faster than dmd and is well
within 10-20% of dmd on debug builds.
In my repeated tests, anyways.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list