[OT] Modules dropped out of C++17

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 06:34:13 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On 10/06/15 09:14, deadalnix wrote:
>>
>> I do think you think at it the wrong way. people are not 
>> telling you it
>> is bad code. You are telling us it is bad code (because you 
>> mention
>> having problem that people using other style do not have).
>
> It is not a problem in C++. It is not a problem with no UFCS.
>
> If the D attitude is "if your style doesn't work with D, then 
> it is wrong", then D has already lost.

Huh? If you have type's method diskIdx and a local variable 
diskIdx, and they are confusing, what it has to do with UFCS?