std.(experimental.)logger voting manager wanted

[weaselcat via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 17:33:06 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 6/13/15 9:22 AM, weaselcat wrote:
>> On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 15:43:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
>> wrote:
>>> On 6/12/15 5:58 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
>>>> std.(experimental.)logger has been in phobos for one 
>>>> release. The idea
>>>> was to mature stuff in experimental for one release and then 
>>>> have a vote
>>>> on inclusion into phobos as std.logger.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to see this vote happen before 2.068.
>>>> Unfortunately, Dicebot is not longer the review manager.
>>>>
>>>> Who wants to count yes/no/(my logger is better) votes in a 
>>>> forum thread?
>>>
>>> I'd say we hold off on this until we finalize reference 
>>> counting.
>>> Right now std.logger requires GC. -- Andrei
>>
>> "proper" reference counting would be trivial to implement with 
>> a real
>> macro system.
>
> The true Scotsman, eh :o). Well we don't have a real macro 
> system. -- Andrei

Yes, and it's an obvious issue. Some of the most frequently 
requested things are real tuple syntax, pattern matching, etc. 
Short of getting these into D itself(good luck,) any attempt at 
these will end up being an ugly hack.