version: multiple conditions

[Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 11:26:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 11:05:36 UTC, ketmar wrote:
>> p.s. i.e. it boils down to simple thing: Walter don't like it. 
>> period.
>> any rationalizing of that is pointless.
>
> The most sensible thing to do with all these may/may not be an 
> improvement and also the break/don't break my code issues is to 
> create an experimental branch of DMD after the transition from 
> C++ to D is finished. Then merge back the good stuff after 
> several iterations of improvement.
>
> I'm sure Walter will be much more open to changes if there is a 
> proven demand for it, e.g. if people rave about certain 
> features in an experimental branch. Changing the main branch 
> with "might be a little bit better" changes is a hard sell when 
> competing languages are going stable.

Not all of them

http://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/39f2t7/planned_breaking_change_in_rust_11/