D could catch this wave: web assembly

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 16:36:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 16:18:01 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> Although I wouldn't put too much reliance on X, what with 
>> Wayland on the way.
>
> meh, wayland doesn't look very interesting to me, especially in 
> this use case where I'd want a network protocol because the 
> application runs on an isolated VM and needs to communicate 
> with the host somehow.
>

I'm not sure of your use case, but wayland is clearly a huge step 
forward compared to X. Take it from someone that have messed up 
with both.