D could catch this wave: web assembly
via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Jun 25 02:04:14 PDT 2015
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 08:13:07 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> Lucky you are if you have only problems with font size. There's
> also a problem that people don't set up their preferred font
> size, so it's understandable that designers may want to work
> this around. And e.g. FF doesn't honor that setting anyway.
Apple messed up the whole preferred font size by having a smaller
default size for Safari than other browsers. That meant that the
site looked wrong on Safari if not hardcoding the font-size, from
the viewpoint of customers. YMMV.
If the site is "responsive" you should get it right by zooming
the whole page anyway. And it makes sense to have larger figures
if you need larger fonts.
Others in the thread has used the term "pixel perfect" to refer
to the "px" unit.
FWIW "px" does not refer to pixel, but is a perception related
unit which is based on the normal view distance to the screen.
This is usually rounded off to the closest whole pixel block
(1x2, 2x2, 3x3 etc).
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list