New names - 2.068 roundup

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 22:12:10 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
> On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 22:11:03 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 01:04:01 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe 
>> wrote:
>>> We disagreed on this on irc, but I ask you to consider the 
>>> following which limits the code breakage a lot more than my 
>>> first proposal in chat:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Couldn't this even be made @nogc by just applying it to 
>> eager()?
>>
>> Very neat. I love it.
>
> Err, everything but eager.

That would be inferred anyway, it's a template. But yes, `eager` 
is strictly an add-on, it doesn't after @nogc-ness of the range.