RCArray is unsafe
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Mar 2 14:57:27 PST 2015
On 3/2/2015 1:09 PM, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= <schuetzm at gmx.net>" wrote:
> "I have discovered a marvellous solution, but this post is too short to describe
> it."
Fortunately, Fermat (er, Andrei) was able to pass along his dazz idea to me this
afternoon, before he expired to something he had to attend to. We were both in
the dumps about this problem last night, but I think he solved it.
His insight was that the deletion of the payload occurred before the end of the
lifetime of the RC object, and that this was the source of the problem. If the
deletion of the payload occurs during the destructor call, rather than the
postblit, then although the ref count of the payload goes to zero, it doesn't
actually get deleted.
I.e. the postblit manipulates the ref count, but does NOT do payload deletions.
The destructor checks the ref count, if it is zero, THEN it does the payload
deletion.
Pretty dazz idea, dontcha think? And DIP25 still stands unscathed :-)
Unless, of course, we missed something obvious.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list