[Semi OT] The programming language wars
Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Mar 20 15:55:23 PDT 2015
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 07:37:04 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> Language features should be tested with real users using
> scientific validation processes, instead of being blindly added
> to a language.
There is nothing intrinsically more scientific about basing a
decision on a study rather than experience and judgement
(including aesthetic judgement), which is not to say that more
data cannot be useful, if thoughtfully considered. The problem
is that people tend to emphasize tangible hard data over
sometimes more important but less easy to measure factors - the
drunk looking for his keys under the lamppost 'because that is
where the light is'.
So one must be careful to avoid being dazzled by shiny
'scientific' approaches when their value remains yet to be proven.
Laeeth.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list