uniform tuple syntax

Tue Mar 24 11:11:42 PDT 2015

On 03/24/2015 03:11 PM, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
> Anything going on with this? Been looking forward to seeing it for awhile.

I think we should settle on a syntax and split DIP32 in a tuple part and
a pattern matching part.
The proposal wasn't yet formally accepted, partly because we wanted to
wait, whether more needs come up. By now it's already 2 years old and it
still looks complete IMO.

http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP32