Benchmark block
Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Mar 31 01:33:32 PDT 2015
On 2015-03-31 01:40, w0rp wrote:
> Why add extra syntax for what you can already do pretty nicely with a
> library?
It would be nice if D could support a generic syntax for trailing
delegates, i.e.
benchmarks
{
}
Would be lowered to:
benchmarks({
});
Then it can be implemented as a library solution with a nice syntax that
looks built-in.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list