std.xml2 (collecting features)

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 2015-05-05 12:41, "Mario =?UTF-8?B?S3LDtnBsaW4i?= 
<linkrope at github.com>" wrote:

> Recently, I compared DOM parsers for an XML files of 100 MByte:
>
> 15.8 s tango.text.xml (SiegeLord/Tango-D2)
> 13.4 s ae.utils.xml (CyberShadow/ae)
>   8.5 s xml.etree (Python)
>
> Either the Tango DOM parser is slow compared to the Tango pull parser,

Yes, of course it's slower. The DOM parser creates a DOM as well, which 
the pull parser doesn't.

These other libraries, what kind of parsers are those using? I mean, 
it's not fair to compare a pull parser against a DOM parser.

Could you try D1 Tango as well? Or do you have the benchmark available 
somewhere?

> or the D2 port ruined the performance.

Might be the case as well, see this comment [1].

[1] 
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/vsbsxfeciryrdsjhhfak@forum.dlang.org?page=3#post-mi8hs8:24b0j:241:40digitalmars.com

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg