Breaking changes in Visual C++ 2015

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 8 May 2015 at 08:45:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 5/8/2015 1:16 AM, "Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?= 
> <ola.fosheim.grostad+dlang at gmail.com>" wrote:
>> And people don't pick a language because of a testing 
>> framework…
>
> Which is why I need to point out just how productivity boosting 
> -unittest and -cov are.

D unittests can be neat for simpler libraries, but they also make 
code harder to browse. Phobos source code clearly suffers from it.

So I'd rather have them separate and have testing-support built 
into the IDE instead. I find that cleaner as unit-tests are 
actually not part of the semantical language, just part of the D 
syntax...

You are probably right that people use them more when they are 
"shipped with the product", though. Whether you ship the compiler 
or a bundle (IDE).