rvalue references
Namespace via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed May 13 23:56:46 PDT 2015
On Thursday, 14 May 2015 at 00:12:05 UTC, bitwise wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2015 08:54:15 -0400, Namespace
> <rswhite4 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As far as I know, the problem (or at least one of the biggest
>> problems) for rvalue references was that they could escape.
>> Since DIP25 is approved and already implemented this problem
>> should be solved. Would it be possible to allow rvalues
>> references now? I'm just curious what the mindfactory of D has
>> in mind and what the scheme for that problem is.
>
>
> Side note: DIP36 seems to be missing the table with the
> authors, status, etc.
>
> Bit
Huh, DIP36? DIP36 was rejected, but the authors (me and Dicebot)
are below.
I've heard that DIP69 is [quote]almost dead in favor of
DIP25[/quote]. That's why I'm a bit confused and would like to
know the scheme, if any. :)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list