std.allocator: nomenclature needed

[Jakob Ovrum via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 15 May 2015 at 07:03:12 UTC, ponce wrote:
> std.allocator.prefab

I like this. If we consider the purpose of the module to provide 
vetted, generally useful allocator compositions, then I think 
this kind of name makes sense. A very different name might be 
possible but it probably requires expressing the purpose of the 
module differently.