Evaluation order of index expressions

[Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d]

On 05/26/2015 07:48 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 12:51:20 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> I guess overloaded operators could be made to cache the old value. (As
>> they do in CTFE, apparently. :o))
>>
>> However, this seems like overkill. Any other ideas?
>
> They can but it wouldn't fix anything. The rvalue is already evaluated
> by then.

I.e. they can't.