Improving assert-printing in DMD

Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Oct 2 04:54:29 PDT 2015


On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 11:22:00 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 10/02/2015 05:32 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
>>
>> I like the idea, I just have a practical question on
>> std.experimental.testing: should it go ahead as-is? Should the 
>> custom
>> assertions be removed and the rest kept? Should they go in 
>> as-is and
>> then deleted when/if this DIP is implemented?
>
> As long as it's in experimental, proceed as you find fit. We 
> can decide later whether changes are in order. -- Andrei

That's what I was hoping for. Good, unless anybody has comments 
to make on the current state of the PR, I'll leave everything as 
it is now.

Atila


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list