D and microservices

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 at 17:31:12 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> My "Go vs D vs C vs Erlang" MQTT shootout was based on a 
> colleague claiming that Go would win because concurrency is its 
> thing. I called his bluff since despite Go having a (AFAIK) 
> very good scheduler, I didn't see how vibe.d wouldn't give me 
> the same performance. I was right.

Yes, Go is unlikely to have any throughput advantages compared to 
a systems level programming language.

Go's advantages:
- a more mature compiler
- robust runtime features
- lower latency GC
- infrastructure support
- simple syntactical constructs

I would consider Go-routines a convenience feature.

If C++17 does stackless coroutines right then it probably will 
surpass both Go and D in terms of memory locality, initialization 
performance and memory usage; and therefore throughput as well.