DIP74 - where is at?

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 12 October 2015 at 06:02:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
>> There are not considered because DIP25 is "simpler" and you 
>> and Walter
>> "like it". As long as nothing changes here, there is really no 
>> point in
>> wasting my time.
>
> That is a fair assessment. Basically I believe DIP25 is good 
> language design, and I have evidence for it. The evidence you 
> showed failed to convince me the design is a hack, and yelling 
> at me is unlikely to help. Please decide as you find fit. At 
> some point it is clear that several language designers will 
> disagree on estimating the quality of something.
>

If you are wondering why I'm inflammatory, here you go. You are 
pulling me the old prove a negative trick. You have good evidence 
that DIP25 is good design ? Good, because I have none. And that's 
my proof. As long as I have no evidence that DIP25 is good, DIP25 
is bad.

> Probably git grep in phobos may be a good starting point.
>

I don't think grepping for return will have a good noise to 
signal ratio. You also mentioned several time that you have good 
evidence that DIP25 rox. Yet, every time you post that without 
any evidence, I'm a bit more convinced that none exists.