Synchronized classes have no public members
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Oct 13 12:05:29 PDT 2015
On Tuesday, 13 October 2015 at 18:28:23 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> Guys, sorry to break into your wishful thinking, but
>
> synchronized(mutex) {}
>
> already works as you want it to since as long as I can think.
> Yes, it takes a parameter, yes it calls lock/unlock on the
> mutex. :)
Yes, and I am saying that it doesn't justify presence of
`synchronized` keyword in the language at all, being historical
legacy misfeature.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list