DIP74 - where is at?

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 13 October 2015 at 22:20:02 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> Maybe, but at this point, I think that C++ is actually getting 
> features faster than D is.

And as a result advanced c++ analyzers work on lowlevel IR, not 
at the language level.

That has many consequences, one is time consumption, another is 
accuracy.

> We talk about adding features or tweaking existing features to 
> fix problems, but we're long past the point where we're 
> frequently adding features.

More syntax sugar is not problematic. It is what you have left 
when you factor out everything that is expressible by other 
mechanisms that matters.