Synchronized classes have no public members

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 2015-10-13 14:56, Dicebot wrote:

> I still have no idea why I would ever use `synchronized` (any automatic
> thread synchronization is harmful in my opinion) so change itself is
> irrelevant. But it may break quite some old Java-liked 3d party code for
> no benefit and that would be annoying.

Like DWT :)

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg