Synchronized classes have no public members

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 10/13/15 2:58 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/5188 implements a
> rule defined in TDPL: synchronized classes shall have no public members.

When I first read this, I thought "how the hell will you use this thing 
then?"

Then after reading through most of this thread, I realize you mean 
public *field* members. Public *method* members are allowed, right?

-Steve