0 in version number?

[Gary Willoughby via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 16 October 2015 at 15:20:54 UTC, Shriramana Sharma 
wrote:
> I always wondered why DMD releases have a 0 in their minor 
> version number -- surely 2.068 is the same as 2.68? Why then 
> retain the zero?

We keep trying to get people to understand the importance of a 
sane version scheme but it always falls on deaf ears. Even Walter 
considers this bikeshedding.

http://forum.dlang.org/post/ocjeghrkfkpjkvbxrzva@forum.dlang.org