0 in version number?

Shriramana Sharma via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Oct 17 19:26:22 PDT 2015


bitwise wrote:

> touch f1.098
> touch f1.099
> touch f1.1.0
> touch f1.1.1
> ls

Sorry don't understand what you are getting at...

-- 
Shriramana Sharma, Penguin #395953


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list