0 in version number?
Shriramana Sharma via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Oct 17 19:26:22 PDT 2015
bitwise wrote:
> touch f1.098
> touch f1.099
> touch f1.1.0
> touch f1.1.1
> ls
Sorry don't understand what you are getting at...
--
Shriramana Sharma, Penguin #395953
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list