Kinds of containers

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 10/21/2015 11:08 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> Exactly. There would be no mutable aliasing. This way, the persistent
> data type can behave like a mutable value type, such as a COW or eager
> copy variant, but with nicer/different performance characteristics. It
> would be great if exchanging different implementation strategies for
> value semantics will be as seamless as possible. (If the initially
> chosen strategy turns out to be wrong, this makes the fix easy.) Of
> course, the implementation of the persistent data structure will be in
> terms of non-mutating and possibly O(1)-COW operations only.

Makes sense. Now that we got to talk - did you submit the bugs you found 
with DIP25? -- Andrei