Option types and pattern matching.

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 2015-10-25 19:23, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:

> I humbly believe that D may just add special re-write rule to the switch
> statement in order to allow user-defined switchable types. This goes
> along nicely with the trend - e.g. foreach statement works with anything
> having static range interfaces or opApply.

Do you think that could handle all different type of patterns? For 
example extractor patterns:

match x {
     case Foo(bar) => println(bar)
}

The above is Scala.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg