Possible solution for export : `unittest export`?
Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Sep 2 03:38:54 PDT 2015
What I meant is, of course you cannot test everything with
unittest. It has a reason that there exist other types of test.
But that should not hold anybody back from unit-testing as much
as possible. If nothing else this is useful because unit-tests
are by far the cheapest tests. And within a library, it should
always be possible to reach a 100% code coverage with unit tests
alone.
For a program with much user interaction this may not be
possible, but that is pretty much out of scope for exported
templates.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list